← 返回地图破甲

Server-Side Request Forgery using Javascript allows to exfill data from Google Metadata

服务端请求伪造 / SSRF / #530974

厂商
Snapchat
严重程度
未评级
赏金
—
弱点
SSRF
研究员
@nahamsec
披露日期
2020-11-30
资产
snappublisher.snapchat.com
CVE
—

该报告还没有中文解读。

原文摘录

摘自原文(2787 字符中的一小部分)
Hey there, I was looking at your ads site with @daeken, we found some weird behavior in the import function of the creative app. Here are the steps:
原文中的代码
from flask import Flask, request
from flask_cors import CORS
from time import sleep

app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)

import logging
log = logging.getLogger('werkzeug')
log.setLevel(logging.ERROR)

@app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
        sleep(3)
        return 'hi!'

@app.route('/log')
def …

默认不展示报告全文。以上为简短摘录,完整复现过程请阅读原文。版权归研究员与 Snapchat 所有。

时间线

阅读 HackerOne 原文 ↗作者 @nahamsec · 版权归作者与 Snapchat 所有

同类报告

SSRF in Exchange leads to ROOT access in all instancesShopify · 2018-05-23Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Analytics ReportsHackerOne · 2023-12-08 · $25,000Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) at app.hellosign.com leads to AWS private keys disclosureDropbox · — · $4,913SSRF on project import via the remote_attachment_url on a NoteGitLab · 2020-06-07 · $10,000Server Side Request Forgery mitigation bypassGitLab · 2020-04-18Blind SSRF to internal services in matrix preview_link APIReddit · 2023-04-26 · $6,000